City Resilience Framework Adaptation Clearinghouse

Based on The Rockefeller Foundation and produced by Arup’s Worldwide Team of developers, the town Resilience Framework is really a holistic, evidence-based framework for understanding city resilience to tell urban planning and investment decisions. The Rockefeller Foundation is applying the framework to produce resilience-building agendas at city-level with current people of the 100 Resilient Metropolitan areas Network. Presenting a comprehensive way of articulating city resilience, the framework underpins and reinforces the town Resilience Index’s full suite of indicators and variables.

The report “;provides a lens by which the complexness of metropolitan areas and also the numerous factors that lead to some city’s resilience could be understood.” To do this, the framework contains 12 key indicators that describe the essential features of a resilient city. The 12 indicators fall under four groups: the health and wellness of people (people) urban systems and services (place) economy (organization) and, finally, leadership and strategy (understanding). The symptoms are performance indicators – describing the end result of actions to construct resilience, and not the actions themselves.

Among the essential aspects of the framework is inclusiveness. The document notes:“Inclusion emphasizes the requirement for broad consultation and engagement of communities, such as the most vulnerable groups. Addressing the shocks or stresses faced by one sector, location, or community in isolation of others is definitely an anathema towards the perception of resilience. A comprehensive approach plays a role in a feeling of shared possession or perhaps a joint vision to construct city resilience” (p. 5). In furtherance of the goal, Rockefeller stresses that metropolitan areas should empower stakeholders, participate in integrated planning, minimize human vulnerability, improve livelihoods and employment, safeguard human health, promote social stability and security, and promote cohesive communities characterised by mutual support.

Analysis for that Framework led to a refined listing of eight city functions which are important to resilience – including that the resilient city: delivers fundamental needs safeguards human existence protects, maintains and enhances assets facilitates romantic relationships and identity promotes understanding defends the rule of law, justice and equity supports livelihoods and stimulates economic success. Based on the report, a city’s capability to perform these characteristics determines if the city is resilient or otherwise.

Situation research is provided which detail on the floor actions by resilient metropolitan areas that have faced disasters. The Surat, India example shows that Surat learned from the disasters of recurrent flooding and resulting pneumonic plague, because they build resilience by making use of training learned across all category regions of the framework. Rapid reaction to a sizable earthquake needed action to aid urban systems and services, and also the economy of Concepción, Chile.