TY – JOUR
T1 – A resilience engineering method of integrating human and socio-technical system capacities and procedures for commercial infrastructure resilience
AU – Thomas, John E.
AU – Eisenberg, Daniel A.
AU – Seager, Thomas
AU – Fisher, Erik
PY – 2019/1/1
Y1 – 2019/1/1
N2 – Despite Federal directives with a built-in method of strengthening the resilience of critical infrastructure systems, little is famous concerning the relationship between human behavior and infrastructure resilience. Even though it is well known that human response may either amplify or mitigate catastrophe, the function of human or mental resilience when infrastructure systems are faced with surprise remains an oversight in policy documents and resilience research. Existing research treats human resilience and technological resilience separate capacities that could create stress problems that do something about each other. There remains a understanding gap regarding study of individuals attributes in every that build infrastructure resilience being an integrated system of humans and technologies. The work draws on concepts based in the resilience engineering and psychology literature to look at the dynamic relationships between human resilience and also the resilience of complex, socio-technical critical infrastructure systems. We identify and organize 18 system capacities and 23 human capacities that influence infrastructure resilience. Then we correlate individual human and system resilience capacities to find out how each influences four socio-technical approaches for resilience: sensing, anticipating, adapting, and learning. Our analysis implies that a persons and technical resilience capacities reviewed are interconnected, interrelated, and interdependent. Further, we discover current literature is concentrated more about cognitive and behavior size of human resilience so we offer methods to better incorporate affective capacities. Together, we present a great way to link the resilience of technological systems towards the cognitive, behavior, and affective size of humans accountable for the machine design, operation, and management.
AB – Despite Federal directives with a built-in method of strengthening the resilience of critical infrastructure systems, little is famous concerning the relationship between human behavior and infrastructure resilience. Even though it is well known that human response may either amplify or mitigate catastrophe, the function of human or mental resilience when infrastructure systems are faced with surprise remains an oversight in policy documents and resilience research. Existing research treats human resilience and technological resilience separate capacities that could create stress problems that do something about each other. There remains a understanding gap regarding study of individuals attributes in every that build infrastructure resilience being an integrated system of humans and technologies. The work draws on concepts based in the resilience engineering and psychology literature to look at the dynamic relationships between human resilience and also the resilience of complex, socio-technical critical infrastructure systems. We identify and organize 18 system capacities and 23 human capacities that influence infrastructure resilience. Then we correlate individual human and system resilience capacities to find out how each influences four socio-technical approaches for resilience: sensing, anticipating, adapting, and learning. Our analysis implies that a persons and technical resilience capacities reviewed are interconnected, interrelated, and interdependent. Further, we discover current literature is concentrated more about cognitive and behavior size of human resilience so we offer methods to better incorporate affective capacities. Together, we present a great way to link the resilience of technological systems towards the cognitive, behavior, and affective size of humans accountable for the machine design, operation, and management.
Resourse:https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/a-resilience-engineering-approach-to-integrating-human-and-socio-
